Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/3056
Title: Computation of Time of Concentration Based on Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Simulation
Authors: Zolghadr, M
Rafiee, M.R
Esmaeilmanesh, F
Fathi, A
Tripathi, R.P
Rathnayake, U
Gunakala, S. R
Azamathulla, H. M
Keywords: runoff
salt solution tracing
empirical formulas
case study
sensitivity analysis
Issue Date: 7-Oct-2022
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: : Zolghadr, M.; Rafiee, M.R.; Esmaeilmanesh, F.; Fathi, A.; Tripathi, R.P.; Rathnayake, U.; Gunakala, S.R.; Azamathulla, H.M. Computation of Time of Concentration Based on Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Simulation. Water 2022, 14, 3155. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193155
Series/Report no.: Water 2022,;14, 3155
Abstract: : Time of concentration (TC) is a parameter in runoff estimation, used to study and design different types of projects in watersheds. Any error in TC calculation leads to an inaccurate estimation of the design flow, which can lead to over-sizing or under-sizing of designed facilities that can have great economic and environmental consequences. Therefore, choosing the correct method to estimate TC is of great importance. Due to the diversity of estimation methods in the literature, the obtained TC values are different. This study aims to present a new method to calculate TC, based on its main concept, i.e., the time required for a water parcel to reach its outlet from the farthest hydrological point of a watershed. A two-dimensional hydraulic simulation was used to model the water parcel travel. A watershed was selected as a case study, and its time of concentration was determined by salt solution tracing. The field measurement results were used for calibration of the numerical simulation model. Meanwhile, 31 empirical relations in the literature were reviewed to determine the most accurate ones. Estimated TC values were compared with the measured ones, and the relative error percentage was used to evaluate the accuracy of the result. In the empirical TC methods, the maximum error was above 300%, and the minimum error was 6.7% for the field studied area. The relative errors of hydraulic simulation outputs were between 3 and 27%. The results showed that only three empirical methods, namely Simas and Hawkins, SCSlag, and Yen and Chow, had the least errors respectively equal to 6.7%, 8.660%, and 13.5%, which can be recommended for the studied area and those with similar hydrological characteristics. On the other hand, hydraulic simulation is also introduced as an efficient method to determine TC which can be used in any desired watershed.
URI: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/3056
ISSN: 2073-4441
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
water-14-03155-v2.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.