Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/3483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWijesuriya, U.K-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-30T04:27:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-30T04:27:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-15-
dc.identifier.citationUttara Kaumadi Wijesuriya. (2022). Protection Status of Geographical Indications (GIs) in Agricultural Sector of Sri Lanka Compared to Other Developing Countries: Special Emphasis on India and Vietnam. Proceedings of SLIIT International Conference on Advancements in Sciences and Humanities, (11) October, Colombo, 140 - 144.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2783-8862-
dc.identifier.urihttps://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/3483-
dc.description.abstractAs a country of agricultural origin in the developing world, Sri Lanka has not adequately focused on the protection of Geographical Indications (GIs) to gain substantial economic returns. Presently, “Ceylon Tea” and “Ceylon Cinnamon” are protected under the Sri Lankan GI regime. India and Vietnam, although in the developing world, have gained considerable success in GI protection and therefore many lessons can be learned from them. The doctrinal and comparative research methodologies were adopted in this study using primary and secondary sources, to compare the GI systems with India and Vietnam. Recently, Sri Lanka has introduced a registration procedure under the sui generis system by an amendment to the Intellectual property (IP) Act. Yet, the efficiency can only be seen in the future, as this mechanism was only enforced from the 16th of March 2022. The same registration procedure is followed by India for a considerable period, and they have been successful in achieving agricultural development through proper enforcement. As per the Vietnamese system, it is necessary to increase the level of awareness in promoting GIs by training national experts, funding technical assistance and providing funds for implementation. They highlight adequate government interventions are necessary for the protection mechanism to be effective which Sri Lanka should look into in greater detail. The main reasons for the slow progress in obtaining protection for potential products are inadequate Government interventions and the recently introduced registration system being too new to assess the progress, as it takes time for the results to be seen.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Humanities and Sciences, SLIITen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPROCEEDINGS OF THE SLIIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES [SICASH];-
dc.subjectAgricultural Sectoren_US
dc.subjectGeographical Indicationsen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping Countriesen_US
dc.subjectSui Generis Systemen_US
dc.titleProtection Status of Geographical Indications (GIs) in Agricultural Sector of Sri Lanka Compared to Other Developing Countries : Special Emphasis on India and Vietnamen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Proceedings of the SLIIT International Conference on Advancements in Sciences and Humanities2022 [SICASH]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
167-171.pdf
  Until 2050-12-31
218.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.