Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomes, P. I. A-
dc.contributor.authorAththanayake, U-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, W-
dc.contributor.authorLi, A-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, W-
dc.contributor.authorJayathilaka, T-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-07T05:09:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-07T05:09:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-15-
dc.identifier.issn0925-8574-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/949-
dc.description.abstractThis study was carried out about two years after a major landslide took place in Aranayake, Sri Lanka to evaluate geo-ecological status quo (spatial variation of vegetation and geo-environmental variables, and the correlations between them), and to identify spatially explicit landscape units (ecotopes). Sampling was done continuously based on a mesh covering visual landslide patch (disturbed area) and its surrounding (undisturbed area). When overlaid with the visual landslide patch, the contours of tree diversity, above ground herb dead biomass, and soil toughness (resistance to penetration) showed a good spatial match or a responsiveness. In contrast, herb diversity and landslide patch did not spatially match. As expected, soil physio-chemistry (soil moisture, organic content, soil toughness, etc.) of the disturbed and undisturbed areas showed significant differences. In contrast to many past studies the disturbed areas showed a better herb diversity, yet in agreement they were mostly nonnative or invasive species. Detrended correspondence analyses revealed the fragmentation was more than a mere separation as disturbed and undisturbed; the disturbed area showed a further fragmentation based on the terrain as hilly and flat. Therefore, the single ecotope existed before the landslide, changed into three. The correlations between vegetative indices and geo-environmental variables in general, varied with the ecotope, elucidating the need of different management strategies. Soil toughness of disturbed areas was significantly lesser than the undisturbed. However, force required to uproot herbs were similar in disturbed and undisturbed areas, indicating adaptation and/or colonization of stress tolerant plants. While agreeing that the area is not suitable for human settlements, we propose to use the area for controlled agriculture, fire wood collection, tourism activities and biodiversity studies, instead of total abandonment. This study gave important baseline data on dynamics of biotic and abiotic factors of a landslide in a tropical environment. Further studies should be continued in the long run to evaluate succession of flora and to identify temporal trajectories of biotic and abiotic factors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcological Engineering;Vol 153 Pages 105914-
dc.subjectEcotopesen_US
dc.subjectLandslidesen_US
dc.subjectSoil moistureen_US
dc.subjectSoil nutrientsen_US
dc.subjectVegetative indicesen_US
dc.titleEcological fragmentation two years after a major landslide: Correlations between vegetation indices and geo-environmental factorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105914en_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil Engineering-Scopes
Research Papers - SLIIT Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0925857420302020-main.pdf
  Until 2050-12-31
2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.