Faculty of Engineering SCOPUS2

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/4897

Browse

Filters

20262

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.Machine learning

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationEmbargo
    Investigation of inelastic response ratios for buildings with damping subjected to near-fault ground motions using numerical simulations and transformer-based models
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2026-03-09) Konara, L; Deshika, T; Gobirahavan, R; Alahakoon, Y; Ekanayake I.U; Meddage D.P.P
    Inelastic responses are used in seismic design to estimate inelastic seismic demand from known elastic demand, yet current provisions remain limited, especially when damping and displacement ductility are considered. This study investigated the inelastic displacement ratio and inelastic velocity ratio for single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems subjected to near-fault ground motions, with particular focus on the effects of fling-step and forward-directivity motions. For numerical modeling and analysis, an extensive nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA) was conducted on SDOF systems incorporating parametric variations in dynamic characteristics of structural systems such as elastic period, displacement ductility, and viscous damping under different ground motion conditions. From numerical modeling, empirical equations are proposed to express the inelastic displacement ratio ((Formula presented) ) and inelastic velocity ratio ((Formula presented) ) using elastic period, viscous damping ratio, displacement ductility, and the type of ground motion. In parallel, neural networks are trained on a dataset of 36,456 samples using additional variables, including the predominant period of the ground motion, moment magnitude, and closest rupture distance. Neural network models achieved (Formula presented) (for (Formula presented) ) and (Formula presented) (for (Formula presented) ) for unseen data, indicating the highest accuracy. Model explanations indicated that the predictions adhere to the domain knowledge. Comparative assessments reveal that while empirical equations capture general trends for design purposes, neural network models accurately predict even minor variations in inelastic responses. These data-driven methods provide a complementary approach in predicting the inelastic response compared to empirical equations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Uncertainty Reduction in Near Real-time Satellite Precipitation Estimates by Integrating Soil Moisture and Potential Evapotranspiration Using a Machine Learning Approach
    (Springer Science and Business Media, 2026) Wanniarachchi, S; Sarukkalige, R; Hapuarachchi, H. A. P; Gomes, P.I.A; Rathnayake, U
    Near-real-time (NRT) satellite precipitation data inherits complex and random errors due to various reasons. The primary objective of this research is to utilize satellite-based precipitation data for hydrological modelling in ungauged areas. The novelty of this study lies in the development of a hybrid stacking-based machine learning framework that integrates hydrologically meaningful predictors: root-zone soil moisture, potential evapotranspiration (PET), and their time-lagged representations to reduce uncertainty in near-real-time satellite precipitation (GSMaP-NRT). Unlike conventional bias-correction approaches that rely primarily on statistical adjustment between satellite and gauge rainfall, this study incorporates physically relevant catchment-state variables to improve predictive skill, with a focus on the Ovens River basin in Australia. A calibrated GR4H hydrological model was used to simulate the runoff of the catchment. Six objective functions were used to evaluate the performance of the approach. The results demonstrate that stacking machine learning algorithms reduces the Mean Absolute Error of GSMaP-NRT satellite precipitation data by 36% and the corresponding modelled streamflow error by 44% for lower precipitation events (< 2 mm/hour). All six objective functions achieved optimal performances within the low precipitation events. However, RMSE remained high for intermediate and heavy precipitation events. The model-estimated major streamflow peaks for the years 2010 and 2016, based on gauged precipitation and ML-corrected satellite precipitation, are 41% and 48% lower than the observed streamflow peaks, respectively. The reasons were the inability of the GR4H model to capture the perfect initial conditions and the x4 time parameter during the calibration process.