Browsing by Author "Ekanayake, I"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Open Access Explainable Machine Learning (XML) to predict external wind pressure of a low-rise building in urban-like settings(2022-07) Meddage, D. P. P; Ekanayake, I; Weerasuriya, A; Lewangamage, C. S; Ramanayaka, C. D. E; Miyanawala, TThis study used explainable machine learning (XML), a new branch of Machine Learning (ML), to elucidate how ML models make predictions. Three tree-based regression models, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boost (XGB), were used to predict the normalized mean (Cp,mean), fluctuating (Cp,rms), minimum (Cp,min), and maximum (Cp,max) external wind pressure coefficients of a low-rise building with fixed dimensions in urban-like settings for several wind incidence angles. Two types of XML were used — first, an intrinsic explainable method, which relies on the DT structure to explain the inner workings of the model, and second, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), a post-hoc explanation technique used particularly for the structurally complex XGB. The intrinsic explainable method proved incapable of explaining the deep tree structure of the DT, but SHAP provided valuable insights by revealing various degrees of positive and negative contributions of certain geometric parameters, the wind incidence angle, and the density of buildings that surround a low-rise building. SHAP also illustrated the relationships between the above factors and wind pressure, and its explanations were in line with what is generally accepted in wind engineering, thus confirming the causality of the ML model’s predictions.Publication Open Access Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)(2022-05-29) Meddage, P; Ekanayake, I; Perera, U. S; Azamathulla, H; Md Said, M. A; Rathnayake, UConventional methods of estimating pressure coefficients of buildings retain time and cost constraints. Recently, machine learning (ML) has been successfully established to predict wind pressure coefficients. However, regardless of the accuracy, ML models are incompetent in providing end-users’ confidence as a result of the black-box nature of predictions. In this study, we employed tree-based regression models (Decision Tree, XGBoost, Extra-tree, LightGBM) to predict surface-averaged mean pressure coefficient (Cp,mean), fluctuation pressure coefficient (Cp,rms), and peak pressure coefficient (Cp,peak) of low-rise gable-roofed buildings. The accuracy of models was verified using Tokyo Polytechnic University (TPU) wind tunnel data. Subsequently, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the black-box nature of the ML predictions. The comparison revealed that tree-based models are efficient and accurate in wind-predicting pressure coefficients. Interestingly, SHAP provided human-comprehensible explanations for the interaction of variables, the importance of features towards the outcome, and the underlying reasoning behind the predictions. Moreover, SHAP confirmed that tree-based predictions adhere to the flow physics of wind engineering, advancing the fidelity of ML-based predictions.
