International Conference on Law and Justice [ ICLJ] 2025

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/4366

Browse

Filters

20252

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Start date: 2025Subject: search.filters.subject.Jurisprudence

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Exploring the Kelson’s Pure Theory of Law beyond the Philosophical Value
    (School of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, 2025-10-10) Kodithuwakku, K N K R
    Jurisprudence is the philosophy of the law, which delivers an interesting narrative by analyzing law from different perspectives. As far as positivism is concerned, this is one of the luminescent schools of jurisprudence among other ideologies. German Positivism ideas differ from the British Positivism since it neither considers ethics nor facts. Kelson is one of the frontline scholars who introduced the Pure Theory of Law by enriching the Jurisprudence widely, while influencing other scholars to contribute to the legal system. Even though this eminent philosophy fattened the Jurisprudence, still there are some existing conundrums which did not fathomed by the Kelson. This paper intends to discuss the nature of the pure theory while focusing on the effectiveness and validity of Kelson’s basic norm with the separability thesis to identify the practical issues for better application.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Theoretical Foundations for Judicial Activism: Some Jurisprudential Perspectives
    (School of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, 2025-10-10) Thilakarathna, A; Seneviratne, W; Abeysekara, T
    Judicial activism has emerged as one of the most debated themes in contemporary jurisprudence, reflecting tensions between judicial restraint and the judiciary’s evolving responsibility to protect rights, fill legislative gaps, and respond to social transformation. This paper explores the theoretical foundations of judicial activism through the lens of four major schools of legal thought: natural law, legal positivism, sociological jurisprudence, and realism. From a natural law perspective, judicial activism gains legitimacy by grounding legal interpretation in morality and the pursuit of justice, particularly where legislative inertia undermines rights protection. In contrast, strict positivism resists activism by prioritizing the sovereign command, yet even withinAustin and Hart’s formulations, space is found for judicial creativity through the recognition of open-textured rules and penumbral areas of law. Sociological jurisprudence situates activism within the broader project of social engineering, encouraging judges to adapt legal rules to shifting economic, political, and social realities. Realism, meanwhile, most directly acknowledges the judicial role in shaping law, emphasizing the judiciary’s practical influence in transforming statutory texts into living norms. Methodologically, the paper employs a doctrinal approach,analyzing jurisprudential theories, judicial reasoning, and key cases to assess the scope andjustification of judicial activism in the protection of human rights and the domestication of international legal obligations. The study concludes that judicial activism, when grounded in principle and institutional responsibility, is not an aberration but a vital judicial function, ensuring the law remains responsive to evolving societal demands and constitutional imperatives.