Faculty of Engineering

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/4203

Browse

Filters

2025 - 20262

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Raheem, SStart date: 2025

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationEmbargo
    Infill Masonry Strut Models in Reinforced Concrete Frames: Multilevel Reliability Analyses for Predicting In-Plane Responses
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2026-03-10) Raheem, S; Thamboo, J; Mallikarachi, C; Wijesundara, K; Dias, P
    The moment-resisting reinforced concrete (RC) frame infilled with masonry walls is a common form of construction for low- to medium-rise buildings. The importance of considering the infill masonry walls (IMW) in seismic analysis is accentuated due to the interaction between infills and the surrounding frame. Several analytical IMW models have been proposed to model IMW as equivalent diagonal struts, and the appropriateness of those models has been justified through experimental and numerical calibrations. However, the reliability of those analytical models is not well substantiated. Therefore, the reliabilities of five different analytical models have been evaluated herein using the First-Order Reliability Method (FORM). The stochastic uncertainties involved in predicting the in-plane capacities of IMW-RC frames have been incorporated in the reliability analyses. Subsequently, reliabilities of IMW models have been ascertained using experimental data sets compiled at two different scales, namely (1) single story–single bay and (2) multistory IMW-RC frames. 120 experimental data sets of single story–single bay IMW-RC frames tested under in-plane loading and three multistory IMW-RC frames tested on shake-tables were used to assess the reliabilities of IMW models. The results showed that the IMW models considered have predicted the in-plane behavior of IMW-RC frames (single or multistory) to certain levels of accuracy. The predicted reliability indices (β values) of the models vary between 1.03 and 4.13. The reliabilities differ when different aspects of the predictions are being considered, such as peak or ultimate load and drift capacities of single story–single bay frames or base shear and story drift of multistory frames. Therefore, depending on the requirement (strength- or displacement-based design), the IMW models should be selected appropriately to carry out the seismic analyses of IMW-RC buildings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationEmbargo
    Resilience of masonry infilled reinforced concrete school buildings in low to moderate seismic regions: case study of Sri Lankan schools
    (Springer Science and Business Media, 2025-12-08) Raheem, S; Thamboo, J; Mallikarachi, C; Wijesundara, K; Dias, P
    The resilience of school buildings in high seismic regions is widely emphasised and evaluated. However such resilience in low-to-medium seismic regions are generally overlooked due to the lower probability of occurrence and low-to-medium intensities expected. Nonetheless, nominal seismic provisions should be provided for the life safety of pupils occupying these school buildings. Therefore, this study was focused on assessing the level of seismic resilience of school buildings in low-to-medium seismic regions, where the archetypal school buildings in Sri Lanka and the seismic demand in the country were taken as the case study. A framework to quantify resilience, incorporating social recovery aspects, was adopted to evaluate the seismic resilience. The resilience of the same archetypal school buildings subjected to different nominal retrofitting methods was also assessed to verify the improvement in resilience compared to un-retrofitted buildings. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties were incorporated by using 25 different recorded seismic accelerograms and Monte-Carlo simulation of material properties (twenty sets of randomised values), respectively; with 500 combinations (aleatoric and epistemic) being analysed for each building type considered. Seismic resilience indices (RIs) obtained indicate that the school buildings with retrofitted configurations are certainly better than un-retrofitted ones, especially for higher hazard levels. Increases in the RIs are in the range of 36.6–91.2% for the highest hazard level. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to ascertain parameter influence on RIs. The proposed nominal retrofitting solutions for these school building archetypes generate adequate resilience against the seismic hazards demarcated for the country.