Enhancing the effectiveness of satellite precipitation products with topographic and seasonal bias correction

Abstract

Estimating precipitation distribution across large regions is crucial for understanding water availability, planning infrastructure, and forecasting flood hazards. Traditional gauge-based methods face challenges, particularly with sparse gauge networks. In response, satellite-based, near-real-time (NRT) precipitation data has gained popularity, especially in poorly gauged watersheds. However, satellite precipitation data quality is often compromised by latency, atmospheric complexities, and topographic effects, resulting in nonlinear errors. To overcome the research gap, this study introduces the Heavy Rain Peak Adjustment (HRPA) method alongside the well-established Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model for satellite precipitation bias correction. The analysis utilised Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP-NRT) data and hourly precipitation records from 31 rain gauges in the Ovens River region of Australia. On average, the mean residual of observed and GSMaP-NRT precipitation was −0.02 mm. Additionally, the HRPA method yielded better linear regression R2(0.911), NSE (log) (−0.847), and RMSE (0.628) compared to SARIMA. The results indicate that HRPA outperforms SARIMA, particularly at lower elevations, whereas SARIMA struggles at higher elevations, underscoring its limitations in those areas. Additionally, autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots for some stations in hilly areas show significant wave-like patterns, indicating greater uncertainty in satellite precipitation estimates over complex terrain. For several stations, autocorrelations at 24 and 48-hour lags suggest a systematic influence of past residuals on future ones, emphasizing the need for further refinement in satellite precipitation correction methods for these regions.