Publication:
Environmental Degradation and Its Implications for Forestry Resource Efficiency and Total Factor Forestry Productivity in China

Thumbnail Image

Type:

Article

Date

2025-07-15

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Environmental costs (carbon emissions) have come with China’s economic rise, and its forestry sector now faces difficulties in maintaining both its profit and the health of its ecosystems. This study assesses the impact of carbon emissions on forestry efficiency and total factor productivity (TFFP) in China’s 31 provinces between 2001 and 2021. Using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model through the slack-based measure (SBM framework) and Malmquist–Luenberger index (MLI), we examine the efficiency and productivity growth of forestry, both with and without accounting for carbon emissions. The study reveals that when carbon emissions are not taken into account, traditional measures of productivity tend to overstate both efficiency and total factor forestry productivity (TFFP) growth, resulting in an average of 7.7 percent higher efficiency and 1.6 percent of additional TFFP growth per year. If we compare the regions, coast provinces with stricter technical regulations have improved efficiency in usage, but places like Tibet and Qinghai, with more vulnerable ecosystems, endure harsher consequences. Regardless of incorporating bad output into the TFFP estimation, China’s growth in forestry productivity primarily depends on efficiency change (EC) rather than technological change (TC).

Description

Keywords

carbon emissions, Chinese provinces, environmental degradation, forestry efficiency

Citation

Wu, F., Yasmeen, R., Xu, X., Kankanam Pathiranage, H. S., Shah, W. U. H., & Shen, J. (2025). Environmental Degradation and Its Implications for Forestry Resource Efficiency and Total Factor Forestry Productivity in China. Forests, 16(7), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16071166

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By